[Disclaimer: As you can see, I’ve titled this piece “Season 6 Episode 3” even though everyone else in the world is calling this “Episode 604.” The reason for this is that I erroneously interpreted the season premiere as one episode when, apparently, it counts as two. I hope you can enjoy this piece, regardless.]
Lost has always been a show about dichotomies, but maybe never more so than in this week’s episode, “The Substitute.” In this episode alone we saw dramatized all of our favorite dualisms. To wit:
- Light vs. dark: Symbolized by the rocks on the scales
- Things you can do vs. things you cannot: Embodied by Alterna-Locke and Un-Locke
- Being trapped vs. being free: Un-Locke again
- Acceptance vs. denial: Alterna-Locke and Alterna-Rose
- Realism (or nihilism, if you want to be dark) vs. faith in miracles
And, beyond that, of course, we have the whole “two timelines” thing going on, allowing us to see two versions of every character operate side-by-side. So we see Evil Island-Ben looking into the grave of one of the many men he killed and Not-Evil-Evil-But-Still-Kind-of-a-Prick-European-History-Teacher Ben who wants to grab a cup of tea with Locke, his new buddy. The Bad Luck Hurley of 2007 is now being contrasted with Good Luck Hurley, the easy-going multi-millionaire from 2004, and Rose, who once was the big lover of faith and hope, is now a grim realist. In fact, we now have two versions of every character, except for Locke, who, being special, gets his very own trinity of selves: Dead Locke (who I like to think of as The Father), Alterna-Locke (who I like to think of as Dead Locke’s spiritual “son”), and Un-Locke (the Unholy Spirit).
Anyway, except in the case of the three Lockes, we’ve seen a lot dichotomies in the last few seasons of Lost, and now it’s coming out big time.
The main question that arises when we think about these dichotomies, of course, is, “Which side is going to win?” Are the writers ultimately going to side with science or faith? Fate or free will? Jacob or the Man in Black? The 2007 Universe or the 2004 Universe? And so on. These are all forms of the same kind of question.
But is that the right kind of question? My theory for a while has been this: Lost’s writers have been tricking us all along. They have been manipulating us–nearly forcing us–to look at the world they’ve created as a Manichean Universe, a big ol’ backgammon board with two sets of pieces and a decidedly “black and white” world view. But this is all a ruse. In the end, my bet is that Lost’s world isn’t Manichean at all. It’s a gray, gray, gray, gray world.