posted by fenzel on Tuesday, September 15th, 2009 at 7:01am
It's amazing, Molly. The love inside, you take it with you. See ya.
Patrick Swayze’s father was a rodeo clown, and his mother was a dance teacher. His first artistic calling was to the ballet. Is there any greater evidence in popular culture that the artist’s soul transmutes?
The arts is more than learning technique, more than honing craft – artists tune themselves as conduits for the expressions, emotions, energies, sympathies, all the quantifiable and unquantifiable good graces of human existence. By learning one, you are learning all of them – so when at some point somebody comes along, takes away your dance shoes and hands you a surfboard, or a horse to ride, a fake gun to fire, lest we forget – a microphone in a studio, or a potter’s wheel – once you figure out what to do with it, you know how to regard it; you know what it means.
And then maybe somebody gives you back your dancing shoes and a pretty girl to dance with who nobody puts in a corner – and you become a legend. And then you leave us (sometimes in Spanish) . . .
Patrick Swayze, deeply spiritual artist, pop culture icon, star of stage and screen, has died at 57.
We had the time of our lives, Patrick. And we owe it all to you.
posted by Matthew Belinkie on Tuesday, February 17th, 2009 at 10:10am
There seems to be a consensus that the Oscars are becoming less and less populist. Back in the day, movies like Star Wars, Tootsie, Ghost, and E.T. were all nominated for Best Picture. This year, a lot of people haven’t seen a single one of the nominees. The Oscars have gone all snooty on us. But here’s my question: can “snooty” be quantified? Can we graph the Academy’s turn towards art house?
(NOTE: This post would not be possible without the badassery of sheely, whose day job involves all sorts of numerical kung fu.)