<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode 76: Degrees of Blindness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/12/14/otip-episode-76/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/12/14/otip-episode-76/</link>
	<description>Overthinking It subjects the popular culture to a level of scrutiny it probably doesn&#039;t deserve.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:05:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Livia</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/12/14/otip-episode-76/#comment-14190</link>
		<dc:creator>Livia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=12028#comment-14190</guid>
		<description>Well ACTUALLY &gt;.&gt;

The Defiant was so named because it was built to defy the Dominion invasion of the Alpha Quadrant.

La la la~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well ACTUALLY &gt;.&gt;</p>
<p>The Defiant was so named because it was built to defy the Dominion invasion of the Alpha Quadrant.</p>
<p>La la la~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perich</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/12/14/otip-episode-76/#comment-13945</link>
		<dc:creator>perich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=12028#comment-13945</guid>
		<description>&quot;thanks for answering my question, that was not the answer i expected.&quot;

If I had to sum up what we&#039;re aiming for in the podcasts in one sentence, it&#039;d be this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;thanks for answering my question, that was not the answer i expected.&#8221;</p>
<p>If I had to sum up what we&#8217;re aiming for in the podcasts in one sentence, it&#8217;d be this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean from philly</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/12/14/otip-episode-76/#comment-13941</link>
		<dc:creator>sean from philly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=12028#comment-13941</guid>
		<description>thanks for answering my question, that was not the answer i expected.  regarding sitcoms and cartooning, there is another argument from understanding comics that fits nicely with the points pete was making.  as an image becomes more iconic, it can represent more and more things.  a photo can only represent an individual person, but a smiley face could be anyone.  As a result, iconic characters are easier to relate to.  sitcoms use stereotypes to facilitate the audience identifying with the show&#039;s stars.

Oh, and to further the little mermaid/phallus debate, there was a sort-of scandal about a subliminal penis on the cover of the little mermaid.
http://www.snopes.com/disney/films/mermaid.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for answering my question, that was not the answer i expected.  regarding sitcoms and cartooning, there is another argument from understanding comics that fits nicely with the points pete was making.  as an image becomes more iconic, it can represent more and more things.  a photo can only represent an individual person, but a smiley face could be anyone.  As a result, iconic characters are easier to relate to.  sitcoms use stereotypes to facilitate the audience identifying with the show&#8217;s stars.</p>
<p>Oh, and to further the little mermaid/phallus debate, there was a sort-of scandal about a subliminal penis on the cover of the little mermaid.<br />
<a href="http://www.snopes.com/disney/films/mermaid.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.snopes.com/disney/films/mermaid.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fenzel</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/12/14/otip-episode-76/#comment-13938</link>
		<dc:creator>fenzel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=12028#comment-13938</guid>
		<description>@Megan

The Little Mermaid is only phallic insofar as much as it is a long, floppy strip that gets tucked in its case and put away when nobody is watching or playing it.

ZING.

Oh, and also, because when boys enjoy The Little Mermaid, they usually do it by themselves in their rooms with the doors locked out of fear they will be discovered by their parents or friends, resulting in embarrassment.

DOUBLE ZING.

The triple zing involves going past the Little Mermaid in the Disney Animated Film Catalog in chronological order and finding the Rescuers Down Under, but I&#039;ll spare you guys that one.

PARALEPTICAL ZING.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Megan</p>
<p>The Little Mermaid is only phallic insofar as much as it is a long, floppy strip that gets tucked in its case and put away when nobody is watching or playing it.</p>
<p>ZING.</p>
<p>Oh, and also, because when boys enjoy The Little Mermaid, they usually do it by themselves in their rooms with the doors locked out of fear they will be discovered by their parents or friends, resulting in embarrassment.</p>
<p>DOUBLE ZING.</p>
<p>The triple zing involves going past the Little Mermaid in the Disney Animated Film Catalog in chronological order and finding the Rescuers Down Under, but I&#8217;ll spare you guys that one.</p>
<p>PARALEPTICAL ZING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan from Lombard</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/12/14/otip-episode-76/#comment-13936</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan from Lombard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=12028#comment-13936</guid>
		<description>couldn&#039;t &#039;Big Bang Theory&#039; fall into the same category as the &quot;stereotypical sitcom&quot;? I mean you have four nerdy boys and the cute girl across the hall whom they interact with and you never see any of the other tenants of the apartment complex. The sterotype would be the whole nerd culture and how smart people generally don&#039;t have great social skills but their hearts are in the right place.

@Fenzel: is the &#039;Little Mermaid&#039; piece about how phallic the movie is? If not then there should be a post by either you or mlawski about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>couldn&#8217;t &#8216;Big Bang Theory&#8217; fall into the same category as the &#8220;stereotypical sitcom&#8221;? I mean you have four nerdy boys and the cute girl across the hall whom they interact with and you never see any of the other tenants of the apartment complex. The sterotype would be the whole nerd culture and how smart people generally don&#8217;t have great social skills but their hearts are in the right place.</p>
<p>@Fenzel: is the &#8216;Little Mermaid&#8217; piece about how phallic the movie is? If not then there should be a post by either you or mlawski about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aidan</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/12/14/otip-episode-76/#comment-13924</link>
		<dc:creator>Aidan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=12028#comment-13924</guid>
		<description>Oh, I&#039;m in Seattle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I&#8217;m in Seattle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.013 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 511/515 objects using memcached

Served from: www.overthinkingit.com @ 2012-02-13 22:57:06 -->
