<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When is a rogue not a rogue? When he&#8217;s Jack Bauer.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/03/18/when-is-a-rogue-not-a-rogue-when-hes-jack-bauer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/03/18/when-is-a-rogue-not-a-rogue-when-hes-jack-bauer/</link>
	<description>Overthinking It subjects the popular culture to a level of scrutiny it probably doesn&#039;t deserve.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:53:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: fenzel</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/03/18/when-is-a-rogue-not-a-rogue-when-hes-jack-bauer/#comment-7287</link>
		<dc:creator>fenzel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=6137#comment-7287</guid>
		<description>@Lee

Grr.

You know why I hate that word?

Because it takes two different standpoints that often coexist in parallel and insists that they constitue one standpoint.

People and art are multideterministic. There are a lot of different things happening at the same time that have to share space. Reducing complex interactions like those between ironic and sincere enjoyments into linear continua cheapens the analysis and ignores much of the value of art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lee</p>
<p>Grr.</p>
<p>You know why I hate that word?</p>
<p>Because it takes two different standpoints that often coexist in parallel and insists that they constitue one standpoint.</p>
<p>People and art are multideterministic. There are a lot of different things happening at the same time that have to share space. Reducing complex interactions like those between ironic and sincere enjoyments into linear continua cheapens the analysis and ignores much of the value of art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gab</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/03/18/when-is-a-rogue-not-a-rogue-when-hes-jack-bauer/#comment-7249</link>
		<dc:creator>Gab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=6137#comment-7249</guid>
		<description>@Lee: Yeah, earony was probably the word I was looking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lee: Yeah, earony was probably the word I was looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/03/18/when-is-a-rogue-not-a-rogue-when-hes-jack-bauer/#comment-7241</link>
		<dc:creator>lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=6137#comment-7241</guid>
		<description>Fenzel, I know you&#039;re not a fan of this word, but I dare say that your post is indicative of an *earonic* appreciation for 24</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fenzel, I know you&#8217;re not a fan of this word, but I dare say that your post is indicative of an *earonic* appreciation for 24</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fenzel</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/03/18/when-is-a-rogue-not-a-rogue-when-hes-jack-bauer/#comment-7240</link>
		<dc:creator>fenzel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=6137#comment-7240</guid>
		<description>@Gab - 

We all pick up little phrases from the people we date over the years, and I think a phrase I picked up from one of my first girlfriends answers your question very well -

&quot;A little bit of Column A, a little bit of Column B.&quot;

And yes, there is a difference. Going rogue implies that you were once officially employed or accredited to do the thing you are now doing independently. Going vigilante doesn&#039;t carry that implication - a civilian can go vigiliante as easily as a police officer.

Also, vigilantism involves a narrower sort of activity - you have to pretty much be a crimefighter to be a vigilante. As we&#039;ve seen in 24, going rogue can involve anything from fighting terrorists to looking up phone numbers when your boss isn&#039;t looking.

So, vigiliantism involves a larger subset of a practitioners, but a smaller subset of actions.

@ Lauren

If you are still in Boston, we need to hang out! This delay is inexcusable! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gab &#8211; </p>
<p>We all pick up little phrases from the people we date over the years, and I think a phrase I picked up from one of my first girlfriends answers your question very well -</p>
<p>&#8220;A little bit of Column A, a little bit of Column B.&#8221;</p>
<p>And yes, there is a difference. Going rogue implies that you were once officially employed or accredited to do the thing you are now doing independently. Going vigilante doesn&#8217;t carry that implication &#8211; a civilian can go vigiliante as easily as a police officer.</p>
<p>Also, vigilantism involves a narrower sort of activity &#8211; you have to pretty much be a crimefighter to be a vigilante. As we&#8217;ve seen in 24, going rogue can involve anything from fighting terrorists to looking up phone numbers when your boss isn&#8217;t looking.</p>
<p>So, vigiliantism involves a larger subset of a practitioners, but a smaller subset of actions.</p>
<p>@ Lauren</p>
<p>If you are still in Boston, we need to hang out! This delay is inexcusable! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gab</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/03/18/when-is-a-rogue-not-a-rogue-when-hes-jack-bauer/#comment-7235</link>
		<dc:creator>Gab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=6137#comment-7235</guid>
		<description>Fenzel: Is this an &quot;I&#039;m making fun of this because it annoys the sh** out of me&quot; kind of post, or an &quot;I&#039;m making fun of this because I love it so much&quot; one?  

Is there a difference between going rogue and going vigilante?

Mlwaski- LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fenzel: Is this an &#8220;I&#8217;m making fun of this because it annoys the sh** out of me&#8221; kind of post, or an &#8220;I&#8217;m making fun of this because I love it so much&#8221; one?  </p>
<p>Is there a difference between going rogue and going vigilante?</p>
<p>Mlwaski- LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lauren r</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/03/18/when-is-a-rogue-not-a-rogue-when-hes-jack-bauer/#comment-7215</link>
		<dc:creator>lauren r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=6137#comment-7215</guid>
		<description>Hilarious post. 

My friend Alan (who you know because he was in Stiles with you) and I have theorized a Platonic ideal of a person called Jack. You get the best sense of the inherent qualities of &quot;Jack&quot; if you mix Jack Bauer, MacGuyver, Han Solo, Rick Blaine, and a wide variety of people who hold the rank/title of Captain (Jack Sparrow, Kara Thrace, Malcolm Reynolds, James T. Kirk, etc.). It involves a heavy dose of &quot;not playing by the rules but still getting the job done&quot;, some &quot;making the absolute optimal use of your giving surroundings or situation&quot;, and a fair share of &quot;thinking 3 steps ahead of anyone else&quot;. 

Some day, when we both have endless amounts of free time, we&#039;re going to do a study and co-write a paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilarious post. </p>
<p>My friend Alan (who you know because he was in Stiles with you) and I have theorized a Platonic ideal of a person called Jack. You get the best sense of the inherent qualities of &#8220;Jack&#8221; if you mix Jack Bauer, MacGuyver, Han Solo, Rick Blaine, and a wide variety of people who hold the rank/title of Captain (Jack Sparrow, Kara Thrace, Malcolm Reynolds, James T. Kirk, etc.). It involves a heavy dose of &#8220;not playing by the rules but still getting the job done&#8221;, some &#8220;making the absolute optimal use of your giving surroundings or situation&#8221;, and a fair share of &#8220;thinking 3 steps ahead of anyone else&#8221;. </p>
<p>Some day, when we both have endless amounts of free time, we&#8217;re going to do a study and co-write a paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlawski</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/03/18/when-is-a-rogue-not-a-rogue-when-hes-jack-bauer/#comment-7213</link>
		<dc:creator>mlawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=6137#comment-7213</guid>
		<description>I was gonna go rogue but then I decided to go paladin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was gonna go rogue but then I decided to go paladin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.016 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 522/526 objects using memcached

Served from: www.overthinkingit.com @ 2012-02-14 01:19:16 -->
