<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode 31: Superbowl Minus Football</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/02/02/episode-31-superbowl-minus-football/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/02/02/episode-31-superbowl-minus-football/</link>
	<description>Overthinking It subjects the popular culture to a level of scrutiny it probably doesn&#039;t deserve.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:16:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Topher</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/02/02/episode-31-superbowl-minus-football/#comment-6103</link>
		<dc:creator>Topher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 20:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=5095#comment-6103</guid>
		<description>I found it interesting how the Overthinlers identified actors to specific roles. 

Samual L. Jackson once commented that film actors give a part of themselves when they portray a character. That their personal identity is lost and they are known and expected to be that character when they meet the public. (I&#039;m paraphrasing. YouTube Sam Jackson at Bernie Mac&#039;s funeral.)

I&#039;m curious how you guys will overthink this. Are movie actor&#039;s sacrificing their identities? Isn&#039;t being IDed as a character a good thing? Are they a bunch of whiny bitches?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found it interesting how the Overthinlers identified actors to specific roles. </p>
<p>Samual L. Jackson once commented that film actors give a part of themselves when they portray a character. That their personal identity is lost and they are known and expected to be that character when they meet the public. (I&#8217;m paraphrasing. YouTube Sam Jackson at Bernie Mac&#8217;s funeral.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious how you guys will overthink this. Are movie actor&#8217;s sacrificing their identities? Isn&#8217;t being IDed as a character a good thing? Are they a bunch of whiny bitches?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Superbowl&#8221; vs &#8220;Super Bowl&#8221;: An American Spelling Crisis &#124; Overthinking It</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/02/02/episode-31-superbowl-minus-football/#comment-5892</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Superbowl&#8221; vs &#8220;Super Bowl&#8221;: An American Spelling Crisis &#124; Overthinking It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=5095#comment-5892</guid>
		<description>[...] day after the game, when our &#8220;Superbowl&#8221; podcast hit the site, I noticed that our editor had chosen to spell it in one word, as opposed to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] day after the game, when our &#8220;Superbowl&#8221; podcast hit the site, I noticed that our editor had chosen to spell it in one word, as opposed to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gab</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/02/02/episode-31-superbowl-minus-football/#comment-5859</link>
		<dc:creator>Gab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 06:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=5095#comment-5859</guid>
		<description>Kevin Costner isn&#039;t as good of an actor as Alec Baldwin- the difference is Alec is *good* enough to pull off the comedian in a successful way (as Wrather says).  Kevin has TRIED the comedy, and failed epically.  _Robin Hood_ and _Dances With Wolves_ were great movies, but that had nothing to do with his acting- it was everything else going on in the movies.   (And to me, Alec will always be Adam from _Beetle Juice_.

I missed the second half (work, alas), but from what I saw, I was fond of the one for Cars.com where the kid &quot;negotiates a later bed time&quot; when he&#039;s three, etc.  

My question: What was up with the f***ing 3D ads?  I mean really, why the Hell would I go out and get 3D glasses to watch a goddamned commercial?  I am now completely against seeing any of the stuff advertised in 3D.

Oh, and here&#039;s a recent ad for Geico I was reminded by when the discussion of Superbowl ads past came up- note the waiter&#039;s accent.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlwjIhHMWLQ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin Costner isn&#8217;t as good of an actor as Alec Baldwin- the difference is Alec is *good* enough to pull off the comedian in a successful way (as Wrather says).  Kevin has TRIED the comedy, and failed epically.  _Robin Hood_ and _Dances With Wolves_ were great movies, but that had nothing to do with his acting- it was everything else going on in the movies.   (And to me, Alec will always be Adam from _Beetle Juice_.</p>
<p>I missed the second half (work, alas), but from what I saw, I was fond of the one for Cars.com where the kid &#8220;negotiates a later bed time&#8221; when he&#8217;s three, etc.  </p>
<p>My question: What was up with the f***ing 3D ads?  I mean really, why the Hell would I go out and get 3D glasses to watch a goddamned commercial?  I am now completely against seeing any of the stuff advertised in 3D.</p>
<p>Oh, and here&#8217;s a recent ad for Geico I was reminded by when the discussion of Superbowl ads past came up- note the waiter&#8217;s accent.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlwjIhHMWLQ" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlwjIhHMWLQ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Puzzling Logic of Conan O&#8217;Brien&#8217;s Super Bowl Ad &#124; Overthinking It</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/02/02/episode-31-superbowl-minus-football/#comment-5853</link>
		<dc:creator>The Puzzling Logic of Conan O&#8217;Brien&#8217;s Super Bowl Ad &#124; Overthinking It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 03:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=5095#comment-5853</guid>
		<description>[...] of the videos that made it into our Super Bowl ad roundup was the Conan O&#8217;Brien ad for Bud Light, in which his agent/manager/ambiguous guy in a suit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the videos that made it into our Super Bowl ad roundup was the Conan O&#8217;Brien ad for Bud Light, in which his agent/manager/ambiguous guy in a suit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 489/493 objects using memcached

Served from: www.overthinkingit.com @ 2012-02-14 02:48:43 -->
