<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Science of Back To The Future [BTTF Week]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/01/16/the-science-of-back-to-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/01/16/the-science-of-back-to-the-future/</link>
	<description>Overthinking It subjects the popular culture to a level of scrutiny it probably doesn&#039;t deserve.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:53:10 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gab</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/01/16/the-science-of-back-to-the-future/#comment-7560</link>
		<dc:creator>Gab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=4272#comment-7560</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDSsKdaW8ho&amp;eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fnerdfighters.ning.com%2Fprofiles%2Fblogs%2Ftime-travel&amp;feature=player_embedded

The &quot;Evil Baby Orphanage&quot; is an idea this guy and his brother have about going back in time, taking babies that grow up to do a lot of bad things to society to some facility, and raising them there instead of going back and actually killing them/their parents to stop whatever it is they end up doing as adults.  The relative time travel stuff starts at about 1:15.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDSsKdaW8ho&amp;eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fnerdfighters.ning.com%2Fprofiles%2Fblogs%2Ftime-travel&amp;feature=player_embedded" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDSsKdaW8ho&amp;eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fnerdfighters.ning.com%2Fprofiles%2Fblogs%2Ftime-travel&amp;feature=player_embedded</a></p>
<p>The &#8220;Evil Baby Orphanage&#8221; is an idea this guy and his brother have about going back in time, taking babies that grow up to do a lot of bad things to society to some facility, and raising them there instead of going back and actually killing them/their parents to stop whatever it is they end up doing as adults.  The relative time travel stuff starts at about 1:15.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreamcatcher</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/01/16/the-science-of-back-to-the-future/#comment-6993</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreamcatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=4272#comment-6993</guid>
		<description>Forget all this time-travel nonsense.  What about Mr. Fusion??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget all this time-travel nonsense.  What about Mr. Fusion??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c0nzo</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/01/16/the-science-of-back-to-the-future/#comment-6951</link>
		<dc:creator>c0nzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=4272#comment-6951</guid>
		<description>what would happen if, on the time numeric pad, you put in like the 29th of febuary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what would happen if, on the time numeric pad, you put in like the 29th of febuary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Government Lie Exposed &#171; Piece Of Mind</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/01/16/the-science-of-back-to-the-future/#comment-6823</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Government Lie Exposed &#171; Piece Of Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 03:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=4272#comment-6823</guid>
		<description>[...] so fast! Schechner at the blog Overthinking It has a few questions. He is troubled by the fact that Einstein arrives in exactly the same place  as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] so fast! Schechner at the blog Overthinking It has a few questions. He is troubled by the fact that Einstein arrives in exactly the same place  as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/01/16/the-science-of-back-to-the-future/#comment-6817</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=4272#comment-6817</guid>
		<description>@Alexander Nahhas  or Joe Nahhas 


What the bloody hell are you going on about? Quack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alexander Nahhas  or Joe Nahhas </p>
<p>What the bloody hell are you going on about? Quack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter Garvin</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/01/16/the-science-of-back-to-the-future/#comment-6504</link>
		<dc:creator>peter Garvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=4272#comment-6504</guid>
		<description>and i think the theory of &quot;if we ever do figure out time travel, why hasn&#039;t there been any time travelers here?&quot; 

im not saying that there are but if there are time travelers here, what do you think would happen if they said they came from the year 3000? they would be locked away in an insane asylum. also, if they said anything about them being time travelers, it could very likely cause a major paradox.

also in bttf part 2, wouldnt that be a paradox? the alternate 1985 where doc is in an insane asylum. he wouldnt have built the time machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and i think the theory of &#8220;if we ever do figure out time travel, why hasn&#8217;t there been any time travelers here?&#8221; </p>
<p>im not saying that there are but if there are time travelers here, what do you think would happen if they said they came from the year 3000? they would be locked away in an insane asylum. also, if they said anything about them being time travelers, it could very likely cause a major paradox.</p>
<p>also in bttf part 2, wouldnt that be a paradox? the alternate 1985 where doc is in an insane asylum. he wouldnt have built the time machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter Garvin</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/01/16/the-science-of-back-to-the-future/#comment-6502</link>
		<dc:creator>peter Garvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=4272#comment-6502</guid>
		<description>the solution is obvious. the delorean always stays at the same point in space no matter where or when it drives to. the delorean moves the universe around it. solved</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the solution is obvious. the delorean always stays at the same point in space no matter where or when it drives to. the delorean moves the universe around it. solved</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Nahhas</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/01/16/the-science-of-back-to-the-future/#comment-6245</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Nahhas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=4272#comment-6245</guid>
		<description>V1143Cgyni Binary Stars Apsidal motion Puzzle solution

 The motion puzzle that Einstein MIT Harvard Cal-tech  NASA and all others could not solve.  

Introduction: For 350 years Physicists Astronomers and Mathematicians missed Kepler&#039;s time dependent equation that changed Newton&#039;s equation into a time dependent Newton&#039;s equation and together these two equations combine classical mechanics and quantum mechanics into one mechanics explains &quot;relativistic&quot; effects as the difference between time dependent measurements and time independent measurements of moving objects and solve all motion  in all of Mechanics posted on Smithsonian NASA website SAO/NASA that Einstein and all 100,000 space-time &quot;physicists&quot; could not solve by space-time physics or any published physics.                  

All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location 
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product 

S = m r; State = mass x location: 

P = d S/d t = m (d r/dt) + (dm/dt) r = Total moment 
   = change of location + change of mass
  = m v + m&#039; r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m&#039; = mass change rate

F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force
   = m(d²r/dt²) +2(dm/dt)(d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²)r
   = mγ + 2m&#039;v +m&quot;r; γ = acceleration; m&#039;&#039; = mass acceleration rate

In polar coordinates system

r = r r(1) ;v = r&#039; r(1)  + r θ&#039; θ(1) ; γ = (r&quot; - rθ&#039;²)r(1) + (2r&#039;θ&#039; + rθ&quot;)θ(1)
Proof:
r = r [cosθ î + sinθĴ] = r r (1); r (1) = cosθ î + sinθ Ĵ 
v = d r/d t = r&#039; r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t = r&#039; r (1) + r θ&#039;[- sinθ î + cos θĴ] = r&#039; r (1) + r θ&#039; θ (1)

θ (1) = -sinθ î +cosθ Ĵ; r(1) = cosθî + sinθĴ

d [θ (1)]/d t=  θ&#039; [- cosθî - sinθĴ= - θ&#039; r (1)  
d [r (1)]/d t = θ&#039; [ -sinθ&#039;î + cosθ]Ĵ = θ&#039; θ(1) 

γ = d [r&#039;r(1) + r θ&#039; θ (1)] /d t = r&quot; r(1) + r&#039; d[r(1)]/d t + r&#039; θ&#039; r(1) + r θ&quot; r(1) +r θ&#039; d[θ(1)]/d t

γ = (r&quot; - rθ&#039;²) r(1) +  (2r&#039;θ&#039; + r θ&quot;) θ(1)

F = m[(r&quot;-rθ&#039;²)r(1) + (2r&#039;θ&#039; + rθ&quot;)θ(1)] + 2m&#039;[r&#039;r(1) + rθ&#039;θ(1)] + (m&quot;r) r(1)
  
 = [d²(mr)/dt² - (mr)θ&#039;²]r(1) + (1/mr)[d(m²r²θ&#039;)/dt]θ(1) = [-GmM/r²]r(1)

d²(mr)/dt² - (mr)θ&#039;² = -GmM/r²   Newton&#039;s Gravitational Equation     (1)
d(m²r²θ&#039;)/dt = 0                           Central force law                              (2)

(2) : d(m²r²θ&#039;)/d t = 0   m²r²θ&#039; = [m²(θ,0)φ²(0,t)][ r²(θ,0)ψ²(0,t)][θ&#039;(θ, t)] 
                                                         = [m²(θ,t)][r²(θ,t)][θ&#039;(θ,t)] 
                                                         = [m²(θ,0)][r²(θ,0)][θ&#039;(θ,0)]
                                                         = [m²(θ,0)]h(θ,0);h(θ,0)=[r²(θ,0)][θ&#039;(θ,0)]
                                                         = H (0, 0) = m² (0, 0) h (0, 0) 
                                                         = m² (0, 0) r² (0, 0) θ&#039;(0, 0)
m = m (θ, 0) φ (0, t) = m (θ, 0) Exp [λ (m) + ì ω (m)] t; Exp = Exponential
φ (0, t) = Exp [ λ (m) + ỉ ω (m)]t  
    
r = r(θ,0) ψ(0, t) = r(θ,0) Exp [λ(r) + ì ω(r)]t
ψ(0, t) = Exp [λ(r) + ỉ ω (r)]t

θ&#039;(θ, t) = {H(0, 0)/[m²(θ,0) r(θ,0)]}Exp{-2{[λ(m) + λ(r)]t + ì [ω(m) + ω(r)]t}} ------I
Kepler&#039;s time dependent equation that Physicists Astrophysicists and Mathematicians missed for 350 years that is going to demolish Einstein&#039;s space-jail of time  

θ&#039;(0,t) = θ&#039;(0,0) Exp{-2{[λ(m) + λ(r)]t + ỉ[ω(m) + ω(r)]t}}

(1): d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ&#039;² = -GmM/r² = -Gm³M/m²r²

      d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ&#039;² = -Gm³ (θ, 0) φ³ (0, t) M/ (m²r²)     

Let m r =1/u

d (m r)/d t = -u&#039;/u² = -(1/u²)(θ&#039;)d u/d θ = (- θ&#039;/u²)d u/d θ = -H d u/d θ
d²(m r)/dt² = -Hθ&#039;d²u/dθ² = - Hu²[d²u/dθ²]

-Hu² [d²u/dθ²] -(1/u)(Hu²)² = -Gm³(θ,0)φ³(0,t)Mu²
[d²u/ dθ²] + u = Gm³(θ,0)φ³(0,t)M/H²

t = 0; φ³ (0, 0) = 1
u = Gm³(θ,0)M/H² + Acosθ =Gm(θ,0)M(θ,0)/h²(θ,0)

mr = 1/u = 1/[Gm(θ,0)M(θ,0)/h(θ,0) + Acosθ]
     = [h²/Gm(θ,0)M(θ,0)]/{1  + [Ah²/Gm(θ,0)M(θ,0)][cosθ]}

     = [h²/Gm(θ,0)M(θ,0)]/(1 + εcosθ)
mr = [a(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)]m(θ,0)

r(θ,0)  = [a(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)] m r = m(θ, t) r(θ, t)
      = m(θ,0)φ(0,t)r(θ,0)ψ(0,t) 

r(θ,t) = [a(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)]{Exp[λ(r)+ω(r)]t} Newton&#039;s time dependent Equation --------II

If λ (m) ≈ 0 fixed mass and λ(r) ≈ 0 fixed orbit; then 

θ&#039;(0,t) = θ&#039;(0,0) Exp{-2ì[ω(m) + ω(r)]t}

r(θ, t) = r(θ,0) r(0,t) = [a(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)] Exp[i ω (r)t]

m = m(θ,0) Exp[i ω(m)t] = m(0,0) Exp [ỉ ω(m) t] ; m(0,0)   

θ&#039;(0,t) = θ&#039;(0, 0) Exp {-2ì[ω(m) + ω(r)]t}

θ&#039;(0,0)=h(0,0)/r²(0,0)=2πab/Ta²(1-ε)²
         
         = 2πa² [√ (1-ε²)]/T a² (1-ε) ²; θ&#039;(0, 0) = 2π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²   

θ&#039;(0,t)  = {2π[√(1-ε²)]/T(1-ε)²}Exp{-2[ω(m) + ω(r)]t 

θ&#039;(0,t)  = {2π[√(1-ε²)]/(1-ε)²}{cos 2[ω(m) + ω(r)]t - ỉ sin 2[ω(m) + ω(r)]t}

θ&#039;(0,t) = θ&#039;(0,0) {1- 2sin² [ω(m) + ω(r)]t - ỉ 2isin [ω(m) + ω(r)]t cos [ω(m) + ω(r)]t}  

θ&#039;(0,t) =  θ&#039;(0,0){1 - 2[sin ω(m)t cos ω(r)t + cos ω(m) sin ω(r) t]²}

         - 2ỉ θ&#039;(0, 0) sin [ω (m) + ω(r)] t cos [ω (m) + ω(r)] t

Δ θ (0, t)        = Real Δ θ (0, t) + Imaginary Δ θ (0.t)

 Real Δ θ (0, t) = θ&#039;(0, 0) {1 - 2[sin ω (m) t cos ω(r) t + cos ω (m)t sin ω(r)t]²} 

W(ob) = Real Δ θ (0, t) - θ&#039;(0, 0) = - 2 θ&#039;(0, 0){(v°/c)√ [1-(v*/c) ²] + (v*/c)√ [1- (v°/c) ²]}²

v ° = spin velocity; v* = orbital velocity; v°/c = sin ω (m)t; v*/c = cos ω (r) t 

v°/c &lt;&lt; 1; (v°/c)² ≈ 0; v*/c &lt;&lt; 1; (v*/c)² ≈ 0

W (ob) = - 2[2π √ (1-ε²)/T (1-ε) ²] [(v° + v*)/c] ²

W (ob) = (- 4π /T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v° + v*)/c] ² radians 
W (ob) = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees; Multiplication by 180/π 

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v°+ v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years  

W” (ob) = (-720x26526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v° + v*)/c] ² seconds /100 years 

The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 - ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²- --.) ≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4)
v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] ≈ √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)]; m&lt;&lt;M; Solar system    
v (M) = √ [Gm² / (m + M)a(1-ε²/4)] ≈  0; m&lt;&lt;M 


Application 1: Advance of Perihelion of mercury.

G=6.673x10^-11; M=2x10^30kg; m=.32x10^24kg; ε = 0.206; T=88days
c = 299792.458 km/sec; a = 58.2km/sec; 1-ε²/4 = 0.989391
ρ (m) = 0.696x10^9m; ρ(m)=2.44x10^6m; T(sun) = 25days
v° (M) = 2km/sec ; v° = 2meters/sec  
v *= v(m) = √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)]; v(M) = √[Gm²/(m + M)a(1-ε²)] ≈ 0
v°(m) = 2m/sec (Mercury) v°(M)= 2km/sec(sun) 
Calculations yields: v = v* + v° =48.14km/sec (mercury); [√ (1- ε²)] (1-ε) ² = 1.552 
W&quot; (ob) = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ²
W&quot; (ob) = (-720x36526x3600/88) x (1.552) (48.14/299792)² = 43.0”/century

V1143Cgyni Apsidal Motion Solution

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v°+ v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years  

v° = -v°(m) + v°(M)  
v* =  2v(cm) + σ
v°(m) = spin velocity of primary
v°(M) = spin velocity of secondary
v(cm) = [m v(m) + M v(M)]/(m + M) center of mass velocity
σ = √ {{[v(m) - v(cm)]² + [v(M) - v(cm)]²}/2} = standard deviation
W° = 3.36°/century as reported in many articles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>V1143Cgyni Binary Stars Apsidal motion Puzzle solution</p>
<p> The motion puzzle that Einstein MIT Harvard Cal-tech  NASA and all others could not solve.  </p>
<p>Introduction: For 350 years Physicists Astronomers and Mathematicians missed Kepler&#8217;s time dependent equation that changed Newton&#8217;s equation into a time dependent Newton&#8217;s equation and together these two equations combine classical mechanics and quantum mechanics into one mechanics explains &#8220;relativistic&#8221; effects as the difference between time dependent measurements and time independent measurements of moving objects and solve all motion  in all of Mechanics posted on Smithsonian NASA website SAO/NASA that Einstein and all 100,000 space-time &#8220;physicists&#8221; could not solve by space-time physics or any published physics.                  </p>
<p>All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location<br />
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product </p>
<p>S = m r; State = mass x location: </p>
<p>P = d S/d t = m (d r/dt) + (dm/dt) r = Total moment<br />
   = change of location + change of mass<br />
  = m v + m&#8217; r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m&#8217; = mass change rate</p>
<p>F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force<br />
   = m(d²r/dt²) +2(dm/dt)(d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²)r<br />
   = mγ + 2m&#8217;v +m&#8221;r; γ = acceleration; m&#8221; = mass acceleration rate</p>
<p>In polar coordinates system</p>
<p>r = r r(1) ;v = r&#8217; r(1)  + r θ&#8217; θ(1) ; γ = (r&#8221; &#8211; rθ&#8217;²)r(1) + (2r&#8217;θ&#8217; + rθ&#8221;)θ(1)<br />
Proof:<br />
r = r [cosθ î + sinθĴ] = r r (1); r (1) = cosθ î + sinθ Ĵ<br />
v = d r/d t = r&#8217; r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t = r&#8217; r (1) + r θ&#8217;[- sinθ î + cos θĴ] = r&#8217; r (1) + r θ&#8217; θ (1)</p>
<p>θ (1) = -sinθ î +cosθ Ĵ; r(1) = cosθî + sinθĴ</p>
<p>d [θ (1)]/d t=  θ&#8217; [- cosθî - sinθĴ= - θ' r (1)<br />
d [r (1)]/d t = θ&#8217; [ -sinθ'î + cosθ]Ĵ = θ&#8217; θ(1) </p>
<p>γ = d [r'r(1) + r θ' θ (1)] /d t = r&#8221; r(1) + r&#8217; d[r(1)]/d t + r&#8217; θ&#8217; r(1) + r θ&#8221; r(1) +r θ&#8217; d[θ(1)]/d t</p>
<p>γ = (r&#8221; &#8211; rθ&#8217;²) r(1) +  (2r&#8217;θ&#8217; + r θ&#8221;) θ(1)</p>
<p>F = m[(r"-rθ'²)r(1) + (2r'θ' + rθ")θ(1)] + 2m&#8217;[r'r(1) + rθ'θ(1)] + (m&#8221;r) r(1)</p>
<p> = [d²(mr)/dt² - (mr)θ'²]r(1) + (1/mr)[d(m²r²θ')/dt]θ(1) = [-GmM/r²]r(1)</p>
<p>d²(mr)/dt² &#8211; (mr)θ&#8217;² = -GmM/r²   Newton&#8217;s Gravitational Equation     (1)<br />
d(m²r²θ&#8217;)/dt = 0                           Central force law                              (2)</p>
<p>(2) : d(m²r²θ&#8217;)/d t = 0   m²r²θ&#8217; = [m²(θ,0)φ²(0,t)][ r²(θ,0)ψ²(0,t)][θ'(θ, t)]<br />
                                                         = [m²(θ,t)][r²(θ,t)][θ'(θ,t)]<br />
                                                         = [m²(θ,0)][r²(θ,0)][θ'(θ,0)]<br />
                                                         = [m²(θ,0)]h(θ,0);h(θ,0)=[r²(θ,0)][θ'(θ,0)]<br />
                                                         = H (0, 0) = m² (0, 0) h (0, 0)<br />
                                                         = m² (0, 0) r² (0, 0) θ&#8217;(0, 0)<br />
m = m (θ, 0) φ (0, t) = m (θ, 0) Exp [λ (m) + ì ω (m)] t; Exp = Exponential<br />
φ (0, t) = Exp [ λ (m) + ỉ ω (m)]t  </p>
<p>r = r(θ,0) ψ(0, t) = r(θ,0) Exp [λ(r) + ì ω(r)]t<br />
ψ(0, t) = Exp [λ(r) + ỉ ω (r)]t</p>
<p>θ&#8217;(θ, t) = {H(0, 0)/[m²(θ,0) r(θ,0)]}Exp{-2{[λ(m) + λ(r)]t + ì [ω(m) + ω(r)]t}} &#8212;&#8212;I<br />
Kepler&#8217;s time dependent equation that Physicists Astrophysicists and Mathematicians missed for 350 years that is going to demolish Einstein&#8217;s space-jail of time  </p>
<p>θ&#8217;(0,t) = θ&#8217;(0,0) Exp{-2{[λ(m) + λ(r)]t + ỉ[ω(m) + ω(r)]t}}</p>
<p>(1): d² (m r)/dt² &#8211; (m r) θ&#8217;² = -GmM/r² = -Gm³M/m²r²</p>
<p>      d² (m r)/dt² &#8211; (m r) θ&#8217;² = -Gm³ (θ, 0) φ³ (0, t) M/ (m²r²)     </p>
<p>Let m r =1/u</p>
<p>d (m r)/d t = -u&#8217;/u² = -(1/u²)(θ&#8217;)d u/d θ = (- θ&#8217;/u²)d u/d θ = -H d u/d θ<br />
d²(m r)/dt² = -Hθ&#8217;d²u/dθ² = &#8211; Hu²[d²u/dθ²]</p>
<p>-Hu² [d²u/dθ²] -(1/u)(Hu²)² = -Gm³(θ,0)φ³(0,t)Mu²<br />
[d²u/ dθ²] + u = Gm³(θ,0)φ³(0,t)M/H²</p>
<p>t = 0; φ³ (0, 0) = 1<br />
u = Gm³(θ,0)M/H² + Acosθ =Gm(θ,0)M(θ,0)/h²(θ,0)</p>
<p>mr = 1/u = 1/[Gm(θ,0)M(θ,0)/h(θ,0) + Acosθ]<br />
     = [h²/Gm(θ,0)M(θ,0)]/{1  + [Ah²/Gm(θ,0)M(θ,0)][cosθ]}</p>
<p>     = [h²/Gm(θ,0)M(θ,0)]/(1 + εcosθ)<br />
mr = [a(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)]m(θ,0)</p>
<p>r(θ,0)  = [a(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)] m r = m(θ, t) r(θ, t)<br />
      = m(θ,0)φ(0,t)r(θ,0)ψ(0,t) </p>
<p>r(θ,t) = [a(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)]{Exp[λ(r)+ω(r)]t} Newton&#8217;s time dependent Equation &#8212;&#8212;&#8211;II</p>
<p>If λ (m) ≈ 0 fixed mass and λ(r) ≈ 0 fixed orbit; then </p>
<p>θ&#8217;(0,t) = θ&#8217;(0,0) Exp{-2ì[ω(m) + ω(r)]t}</p>
<p>r(θ, t) = r(θ,0) r(0,t) = [a(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)] Exp[i ω (r)t]</p>
<p>m = m(θ,0) Exp[i ω(m)t] = m(0,0) Exp [ỉ ω(m) t] ; m(0,0)   </p>
<p>θ&#8217;(0,t) = θ&#8217;(0, 0) Exp {-2ì[ω(m) + ω(r)]t}</p>
<p>θ&#8217;(0,0)=h(0,0)/r²(0,0)=2πab/Ta²(1-ε)²</p>
<p>         = 2πa² [√ (1-ε²)]/T a² (1-ε) ²; θ&#8217;(0, 0) = 2π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²   </p>
<p>θ&#8217;(0,t)  = {2π[√(1-ε²)]/T(1-ε)²}Exp{-2[ω(m) + ω(r)]t </p>
<p>θ&#8217;(0,t)  = {2π[√(1-ε²)]/(1-ε)²}{cos 2[ω(m) + ω(r)]t &#8211; ỉ sin 2[ω(m) + ω(r)]t}</p>
<p>θ&#8217;(0,t) = θ&#8217;(0,0) {1- 2sin² [ω(m) + ω(r)]t &#8211; ỉ 2isin [ω(m) + ω(r)]t cos [ω(m) + ω(r)]t}  </p>
<p>θ&#8217;(0,t) =  θ&#8217;(0,0){1 &#8211; 2[sin ω(m)t cos ω(r)t + cos ω(m) sin ω(r) t]²}</p>
<p>         &#8211; 2ỉ θ&#8217;(0, 0) sin [ω (m) + ω(r)] t cos [ω (m) + ω(r)] t</p>
<p>Δ θ (0, t)        = Real Δ θ (0, t) + Imaginary Δ θ (0.t)</p>
<p> Real Δ θ (0, t) = θ&#8217;(0, 0) {1 &#8211; 2[sin ω (m) t cos ω(r) t + cos ω (m)t sin ω(r)t]²} </p>
<p>W(ob) = Real Δ θ (0, t) &#8211; θ&#8217;(0, 0) = &#8211; 2 θ&#8217;(0, 0){(v°/c)√ [1-(v*/c) ²] + (v*/c)√ [1- (v°/c) ²]}²</p>
<p>v ° = spin velocity; v* = orbital velocity; v°/c = sin ω (m)t; v*/c = cos ω (r) t </p>
<p>v°/c &lt;&lt; 1; (v°/c)² ≈ 0; v*/c &lt;&lt; 1; (v*/c)² ≈ 0</p>
<p>W (ob) = &#8211; 2[2π √ (1-ε²)/T (1-ε) ²] [(v° + v*)/c] ²</p>
<p>W (ob) = (- 4π /T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v° + v*)/c] ² radians<br />
W (ob) = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees; Multiplication by 180/π </p>
<p>W° (ob) = (-720&#215;36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v°+ v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years  </p>
<p>W” (ob) = (-720&#215;26526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v° + v*)/c] ² seconds /100 years </p>
<p>The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 &#8211; ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²- &#8211;.) ≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4)<br />
v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] ≈ √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)]; m&lt;&lt;M; Solar system<br />
v (M) = √ [Gm² / (m + M)a(1-ε²/4)] ≈  0; m&lt;&lt;M </p>
<p>Application 1: Advance of Perihelion of mercury.</p>
<p>G=6.673&#215;10^-11; M=2&#215;10^30kg; m=.32&#215;10^24kg; ε = 0.206; T=88days<br />
c = 299792.458 km/sec; a = 58.2km/sec; 1-ε²/4 = 0.989391<br />
ρ (m) = 0.696&#215;10^9m; ρ(m)=2.44&#215;10^6m; T(sun) = 25days<br />
v° (M) = 2km/sec ; v° = 2meters/sec<br />
v *= v(m) = √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)]; v(M) = √[Gm²/(m + M)a(1-ε²)] ≈ 0<br />
v°(m) = 2m/sec (Mercury) v°(M)= 2km/sec(sun)<br />
Calculations yields: v = v* + v° =48.14km/sec (mercury); [√ (1- ε²)] (1-ε) ² = 1.552<br />
W&#8221; (ob) = (-720&#215;36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ²<br />
W&#8221; (ob) = (-720&#215;36526x3600/88) x (1.552) (48.14/299792)² = 43.0”/century</p>
<p>V1143Cgyni Apsidal Motion Solution</p>
<p>W° (ob) = (-720&#215;36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v°+ v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years  </p>
<p>v° = -v°(m) + v°(M)<br />
v* =  2v(cm) + σ<br />
v°(m) = spin velocity of primary<br />
v°(M) = spin velocity of secondary<br />
v(cm) = [m v(m) + M v(M)]/(m + M) center of mass velocity<br />
σ = √ {{[v(m) - v(cm)]² + [v(M) - v(cm)]²}/2} = standard deviation<br />
W° = 3.36°/century as reported in many articles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technocarotte &#187; Ghostbusters: le jeu.. qu&#8217;est-ce qui se passe?</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/01/16/the-science-of-back-to-the-future/#comment-5942</link>
		<dc:creator>technocarotte &#187; Ghostbusters: le jeu.. qu&#8217;est-ce qui se passe?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=4272#comment-5942</guid>
		<description>[...] &#160;  &#160;Standard Podcast [14:47m]: Play Now &#124; Play in Popup &#124; Download    cast: Cybermaniax source: Ars Technica Overthinking It [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &nbsp;  &nbsp;Standard Podcast [14:47m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download    cast: Cybermaniax source: Ars Technica Overthinking It [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Nahhas</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2009/01/16/the-science-of-back-to-the-future/#comment-5577</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Nahhas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=4272#comment-5577</guid>
		<description>E=mc²/2
2009 is the end of Einstein&#039;s space-jail of time and Fraud symbol E=mc² 
Joenahhas1958@yahoo.com 
Time is not a structure like space to allow space-to time-back to space jumping claimed by Physicists regardless of what physicists have to say about it because Physics is a business and not necessarily science or scientific and like every business it comes with fraud and fraud is Einstein&#039;s space-time (x, y, z, it) continuum that led to fraud symbol E=mc² and yes I am saying that 109 years of Nobel prize winners physics and physicists are all wrong and space-time physics is based on scientific fraud. When &quot;results&quot; expected and &quot;No&quot; discovery, Physicists rigged Physics for grant money since the start of the industrial revolution. Physics today is at least 51 % fraud! 
r ------------------&gt;&gt;Exp (ì w t) ----------&gt;&gt; S=r Exp (ì wt)   Nahhas&#039; Equation
Orbit--------&gt;&gt; Orbit light sensing------&gt;&gt; Visual Orbit; Exp = Exponential
Particle ----&gt;&gt; light sensing of moving objects------------ &gt;&gt; Wave
Newton---------&gt;&gt;light sensing----------&gt;&gt; Quantum
Quantum = Newton x Visual Effects
Quantum - Newton = Relativistic = Optical Illusions 
E (Energy by definition) = mv²/2 = mc²/2; if v = c 
m = mass; v= speed; c= light speed; w= angular velocity; t= time
S = r Exp (ì w t) = r [cos (wt) + ì sin (wt)] Visual effects
P = visual velocity = change of visual location
P = d S/d t = v Exp (ì w t) + ì w r Exp (ì w t)
   = (v + ì w r) Exp (ì w t) = v (1 + ì) Exp (ì w t) = visual speed; v = wr 
E (visual energy= what you see in lab) = m p²/2; replace v by p in E = mv²/2
      = m p²/2 = m v²/2 (1 + ì) ² Exp (2ì wt)
     = mv²/2 (2ì) [cosine (2wt) + ì sine (2wt)]
      =ì mv² [1 - 2 sine² (wt) + 2 ì sine (wt) cosine (wt)];v = speed; c = light speed 
wt = π/2
E (visual) = ìmv² (1 - 2 + 0)
E (visual) = -ì mc² ≡ mc² (absolute value;-ì = negative complex unit)   If v = c
w t = π/4
E (visual) = imv² [1-1 +ỉ] =-mc²; v = c
wt =-π/4+ỉln2/2; 2ỉ wt=-ỉπ/2 - ln2
Exp (2i wt) = Exp [-ỉπ/2] Exp [ln(1/2)]=[-ỉ (1/2)]
E (visual) = imv² (-ỉ/2) =1/2mc² v = c  
Conclusion:  E = mc² is the visual Illusion of E = mc²/2                                           joenahhas1958@yahoo.com.         All rights reserved.
PS: In case of E=mc² claims to be rest energy claims then
E=1/2m (m v + m&#039; r) ² = (1/2m) (m&#039; r) ²; v = 0
E = (1/2m) (mc) ²; m&#039; r =mc
E=mc²/2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E=mc²/2<br />
2009 is the end of Einstein&#8217;s space-jail of time and Fraud symbol E=mc²<br />
<a href="mailto:Joenahhas1958@yahoo.com">Joenahhas1958@yahoo.com</a><br />
Time is not a structure like space to allow space-to time-back to space jumping claimed by Physicists regardless of what physicists have to say about it because Physics is a business and not necessarily science or scientific and like every business it comes with fraud and fraud is Einstein&#8217;s space-time (x, y, z, it) continuum that led to fraud symbol E=mc² and yes I am saying that 109 years of Nobel prize winners physics and physicists are all wrong and space-time physics is based on scientific fraud. When &#8220;results&#8221; expected and &#8220;No&#8221; discovery, Physicists rigged Physics for grant money since the start of the industrial revolution. Physics today is at least 51 % fraud!<br />
r &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&gt;&gt;Exp (ì w t) &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-&gt;&gt; S=r Exp (ì wt)   Nahhas&#8217; Equation<br />
Orbit&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;&gt;&gt; Orbit light sensing&#8212;&#8212;&gt;&gt; Visual Orbit; Exp = Exponential<br />
Particle &#8212;-&gt;&gt; light sensing of moving objects&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212; &gt;&gt; Wave<br />
Newton&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&gt;&gt;light sensing&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-&gt;&gt; Quantum<br />
Quantum = Newton x Visual Effects<br />
Quantum &#8211; Newton = Relativistic = Optical Illusions<br />
E (Energy by definition) = mv²/2 = mc²/2; if v = c<br />
m = mass; v= speed; c= light speed; w= angular velocity; t= time<br />
S = r Exp (ì w t) = r [cos (wt) + ì sin (wt)] Visual effects<br />
P = visual velocity = change of visual location<br />
P = d S/d t = v Exp (ì w t) + ì w r Exp (ì w t)<br />
   = (v + ì w r) Exp (ì w t) = v (1 + ì) Exp (ì w t) = visual speed; v = wr<br />
E (visual energy= what you see in lab) = m p²/2; replace v by p in E = mv²/2<br />
      = m p²/2 = m v²/2 (1 + ì) ² Exp (2ì wt)<br />
     = mv²/2 (2ì) [cosine (2wt) + ì sine (2wt)]<br />
      =ì mv² [1 - 2 sine² (wt) + 2 ì sine (wt) cosine (wt)];v = speed; c = light speed<br />
wt = π/2<br />
E (visual) = ìmv² (1 &#8211; 2 + 0)<br />
E (visual) = -ì mc² ≡ mc² (absolute value;-ì = negative complex unit)   If v = c<br />
w t = π/4<br />
E (visual) = imv² [1-1 +ỉ] =-mc²; v = c<br />
wt =-π/4+ỉln2/2; 2ỉ wt=-ỉπ/2 &#8211; ln2<br />
Exp (2i wt) = Exp [-ỉπ/2] Exp [ln(1/2)]=[-ỉ (1/2)]<br />
E (visual) = imv² (-ỉ/2) =1/2mc² v = c<br />
Conclusion:  E = mc² is the visual Illusion of E = mc²/2                                           <a href="mailto:joenahhas1958@yahoo.com">joenahhas1958@yahoo.com</a>.         All rights reserved.<br />
PS: In case of E=mc² claims to be rest energy claims then<br />
E=1/2m (m v + m&#8217; r) ² = (1/2m) (m&#8217; r) ²; v = 0<br />
E = (1/2m) (mc) ²; m&#8217; r =mc<br />
E=mc²/2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
