<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The luckiest line in movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/11/10/the-luckiest-line-in-movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/11/10/the-luckiest-line-in-movies/</link>
	<description>Overthinking It subjects the popular culture to a level of scrutiny it probably doesn&#039;t deserve.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:53:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Drex</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/11/10/the-luckiest-line-in-movies/#comment-3528</link>
		<dc:creator>Drex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=1276#comment-3528</guid>
		<description>I figured you might want to talk about the film where this line first appears. Gilda (1946).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lH9Yv7TOH20   -2:22</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured you might want to talk about the film where this line first appears. Gilda (1946).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lH9Yv7TOH20" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lH9Yv7TOH20</a>   -2:22</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brez</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/11/10/the-luckiest-line-in-movies/#comment-3232</link>
		<dc:creator>Brez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=1276#comment-3232</guid>
		<description>I think you should also edit in Chigur (sp?) from No Country for Old Men, where the luck of others is decided based on coin flips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you should also edit in Chigur (sp?) from No Country for Old Men, where the luck of others is decided based on coin flips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Belinkie</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/11/10/the-luckiest-line-in-movies/#comment-2693</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Belinkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=1276#comment-2693</guid>
		<description>Gab -

All good points. It&#039;s true that when Harvey says the line, it&#039;s kind of cute, and when Cal says it, you want him to drown. Certainly, I can&#039;t claim that Cal and Harvey are two of a kind. Harvey&#039;s a legitimately good man. Cal is a douche. (I&#039;m a fan of Titanic, but subtlety is not one of its strong points - Cal is the bad guy, and James Cameron is not interested in making him remotely sympathetic.)

- Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gab -</p>
<p>All good points. It&#8217;s true that when Harvey says the line, it&#8217;s kind of cute, and when Cal says it, you want him to drown. Certainly, I can&#8217;t claim that Cal and Harvey are two of a kind. Harvey&#8217;s a legitimately good man. Cal is a douche. (I&#8217;m a fan of Titanic, but subtlety is not one of its strong points &#8211; Cal is the bad guy, and James Cameron is not interested in making him remotely sympathetic.)</p>
<p>- Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gab</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/11/10/the-luckiest-line-in-movies/#comment-2691</link>
		<dc:creator>Gab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=1276#comment-2691</guid>
		<description>God, I write way too much every time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God, I write way too much every time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gab</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/11/10/the-luckiest-line-in-movies/#comment-2690</link>
		<dc:creator>Gab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=1276#comment-2690</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t disclose where you got those clips from.  I&#039;m claiming plausible deniability.

&quot;But after they lose their fiancés, they become the primary antagonists, trying to kill the people who once trusted them.&quot;  Anyhoo, I think you&#039;re a bit off on the relationship between Cal and Jack.  It seems to me that Jack always knew Rose was unhappy with Cal, so he probably never trusted him at all.  Jack could see right through Cal&#039;s outward facade, and Cal knew it and resented it the whole time (plus the fact that he saw Jack as a threat to his position of power over Rose)- hence Cal&#039;s attempts to sideswipe Jack so many times.

I do think another important difference to point out is the nature of the scene when each man says the line and whom they are speaking to.  Both times, Harvey is talking to Rachel privately (although in public- side conversation) and trying to comfort/placate her in some fashion: first to reassure her that he&#039;s not crazy, then to reassure her that he isn&#039;t about to die.  The first time it happens with Cal, he&#039;s talking to two at once: the group at the table is meant to hear it, but it&#039;s directed at Jack and is intended to insult him; the second time, he&#039;s alone with his (crazy) man-servant, Lovejoy (terribly ironic name, eh? too bad he&#039;s so unlike the B5 character he played in season one), and he&#039;s talking about being underhanded and buying his way off of the sinking vessel.  Further, I think it had already been clear that Cal had either fallen from grace or never was even there (which one is correct is debatable) by the time Cal says it the second time, whereas Harvey was still Harvey that second time.  In other, more succinct, words, Harvey does it to be nice and Cal does it to be not-so-nice; Harvey does it for someone else&#039;s sake, Cal does it for his own sake.  

So maybe that&#039;s why I cried when Harvey died but laughed when Old Rose said he &quot;put a pistol in his mouth that year&quot; or whatever the exact quote is.  And maybe that has to do with the differences in how their deaths were treated: the (surviving) characters that knew and respected Harvey before he turned protected his reputation and/or mourned him; but those associated with Cal forgot about him (as far as we can tell).  

I suppose one could probably write a full paper on the differences between the two characters, though.  Even knowing the Batman mythos, Harvey&#039;s transformation was still much more traumatic than Cal&#039;s for me (and whether Cal even &quot;transforms&quot; versus &quot;evolves&quot; is, again, a debate in itself).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t disclose where you got those clips from.  I&#8217;m claiming plausible deniability.</p>
<p>&#8220;But after they lose their fiancés, they become the primary antagonists, trying to kill the people who once trusted them.&#8221;  Anyhoo, I think you&#8217;re a bit off on the relationship between Cal and Jack.  It seems to me that Jack always knew Rose was unhappy with Cal, so he probably never trusted him at all.  Jack could see right through Cal&#8217;s outward facade, and Cal knew it and resented it the whole time (plus the fact that he saw Jack as a threat to his position of power over Rose)- hence Cal&#8217;s attempts to sideswipe Jack so many times.</p>
<p>I do think another important difference to point out is the nature of the scene when each man says the line and whom they are speaking to.  Both times, Harvey is talking to Rachel privately (although in public- side conversation) and trying to comfort/placate her in some fashion: first to reassure her that he&#8217;s not crazy, then to reassure her that he isn&#8217;t about to die.  The first time it happens with Cal, he&#8217;s talking to two at once: the group at the table is meant to hear it, but it&#8217;s directed at Jack and is intended to insult him; the second time, he&#8217;s alone with his (crazy) man-servant, Lovejoy (terribly ironic name, eh? too bad he&#8217;s so unlike the B5 character he played in season one), and he&#8217;s talking about being underhanded and buying his way off of the sinking vessel.  Further, I think it had already been clear that Cal had either fallen from grace or never was even there (which one is correct is debatable) by the time Cal says it the second time, whereas Harvey was still Harvey that second time.  In other, more succinct, words, Harvey does it to be nice and Cal does it to be not-so-nice; Harvey does it for someone else&#8217;s sake, Cal does it for his own sake.  </p>
<p>So maybe that&#8217;s why I cried when Harvey died but laughed when Old Rose said he &#8220;put a pistol in his mouth that year&#8221; or whatever the exact quote is.  And maybe that has to do with the differences in how their deaths were treated: the (surviving) characters that knew and respected Harvey before he turned protected his reputation and/or mourned him; but those associated with Cal forgot about him (as far as we can tell).  </p>
<p>I suppose one could probably write a full paper on the differences between the two characters, though.  Even knowing the Batman mythos, Harvey&#8217;s transformation was still much more traumatic than Cal&#8217;s for me (and whether Cal even &#8220;transforms&#8221; versus &#8220;evolves&#8221; is, again, a debate in itself).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/11/10/the-luckiest-line-in-movies/#comment-2666</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=1276#comment-2666</guid>
		<description>&quot;Considering this line is delivered by characters who wind up dead, I question its wisdom — and theirs.&quot;

Actually, Dent is the one that dies, not Billy Zane&#039;s character. Well, obviously Zane dies, but not on the ship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Considering this line is delivered by characters who wind up dead, I question its wisdom — and theirs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, Dent is the one that dies, not Billy Zane&#8217;s character. Well, obviously Zane dies, but not on the ship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh P</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/11/10/the-luckiest-line-in-movies/#comment-2665</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=1276#comment-2665</guid>
		<description>You forgot the biggest disparity between the two movies:  One got its main intake from repeat viewings from teenage girls; the other from teenage boys (I&#039;ll let you guess which is which).

Spot on for catching the coincidental line and to Becky for her ROTK notice.  Would you like to see my script where Bernard Hill utters the &quot;lucky line&quot;?  I wrote it for some teenagers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot the biggest disparity between the two movies:  One got its main intake from repeat viewings from teenage girls; the other from teenage boys (I&#8217;ll let you guess which is which).</p>
<p>Spot on for catching the coincidental line and to Becky for her ROTK notice.  Would you like to see my script where Bernard Hill utters the &#8220;lucky line&#8221;?  I wrote it for some teenagers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/11/10/the-luckiest-line-in-movies/#comment-2662</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=1276#comment-2662</guid>
		<description>whoops, make that &quot;king&quot; of the world :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whoops, make that &#8220;king&#8221; of the world :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/11/10/the-luckiest-line-in-movies/#comment-2661</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=1276#comment-2661</guid>
		<description>Personally, I don&#039;t think of that line as being quite as prominent in Titanic.  I thought that movie&#039;s most prominent line was &quot;I&#039;m kind of the world!&quot;

And if we&#039;re talking world wide box office, the top two positions are held by Titanic and Return of the King.  Both of which have Bernard Hill in them.  So maybe he&#039;s a lucky charm...

Interesting comparisons though (although I believe Harvey to be a much more fleshed out character than Cal).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t think of that line as being quite as prominent in Titanic.  I thought that movie&#8217;s most prominent line was &#8220;I&#8217;m kind of the world!&#8221;</p>
<p>And if we&#8217;re talking world wide box office, the top two positions are held by Titanic and Return of the King.  Both of which have Bernard Hill in them.  So maybe he&#8217;s a lucky charm&#8230;</p>
<p>Interesting comparisons though (although I believe Harvey to be a much more fleshed out character than Cal).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Coldheart</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/11/10/the-luckiest-line-in-movies/#comment-2660</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Coldheart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=1276#comment-2660</guid>
		<description>The first time IMDb shows a variation of that line occurring is in the Gregory Peck war propaganda flick, Twelve O&#039;Clock High (1949).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first time IMDb shows a variation of that line occurring is in the Gregory Peck war propaganda flick, Twelve O&#8217;Clock High (1949).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 555/559 objects using memcached

Served from: www.overthinkingit.com @ 2012-02-14 01:33:59 -->
