<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not cool, Dorothy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/10/26/not-cool-dorothy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/10/26/not-cool-dorothy/</link>
	<description>Overthinking It subjects the popular culture to a level of scrutiny it probably doesn&#039;t deserve.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:01:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Hazel</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/10/26/not-cool-dorothy/#comment-2407</link>
		<dc:creator>Hazel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=2279#comment-2407</guid>
		<description>I heard that there was a whole subplot that got cut from the film involving a romance between Dorothy and the Scarecrow (who also, if you remember, was one of the farmhands).  

There was no romance subplot in the book, which is good considering she was maybe 11.  It&#039;s unclear exactly how old Dorothy is in the film, but at least it&#039;s older than that.  I hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard that there was a whole subplot that got cut from the film involving a romance between Dorothy and the Scarecrow (who also, if you remember, was one of the farmhands).  </p>
<p>There was no romance subplot in the book, which is good considering she was maybe 11.  It&#8217;s unclear exactly how old Dorothy is in the film, but at least it&#8217;s older than that.  I hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gab</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/10/26/not-cool-dorothy/#comment-2396</link>
		<dc:creator>Gab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 19:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=2279#comment-2396</guid>
		<description>Belinkie, you&#039;re forgetting a crucial aspect of her relationship with the Scarecrow as opposed to the other two: he was her first companion from Oz.  Sure, she met the Munchkins and Glinda, but they left her once she reached the edge of Munchkinland.  He was the first to stick with her on her journey.  It must have been quite a relief when he agreed to accompany her to the Emerald City, for as much as she loved Toto, he couldn&#039;t exactly provide conversation or companionship the way a biped with more cognitive capabilities could.  So she probably harbored a special endearment to him, since he was the first to stick with her.  And since it was just the two of them for a while (plus the dog), Dorothy and the Scarecrow had their own shenanigans, without anyone else there to take from the friendship pie.  This gave them the opportunity to develop a relationship of more intimacy than the ones she developed with the Tin Man and Cowardly Lion, for the latter two had others there to share the pie with when they first arrived.  

So yeah, maybe she was being a little insensitive toward the other two, but she WAS only a teenager; and really, all she was doing was being honest in the face of saying goodbye to someone so important to her.  Call it the brutal honesty of the innocent, somewhat like when a three-year-old asks what the huge red spot (i.e. pimple) on your nose is very loudly.  She was just speaking from her heart and stating the conclusions she had come to.   

And here comes the book v. movie question.  I have never read the book, but I am curious as to whether she says she&#039;d miss the Scarecrow &quot;most of all&quot; or something along those lines in that case.  I&#039;m going to adjudge a guess of no, but if you or anyone else has read it and can clear it up, that would be awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belinkie, you&#8217;re forgetting a crucial aspect of her relationship with the Scarecrow as opposed to the other two: he was her first companion from Oz.  Sure, she met the Munchkins and Glinda, but they left her once she reached the edge of Munchkinland.  He was the first to stick with her on her journey.  It must have been quite a relief when he agreed to accompany her to the Emerald City, for as much as she loved Toto, he couldn&#8217;t exactly provide conversation or companionship the way a biped with more cognitive capabilities could.  So she probably harbored a special endearment to him, since he was the first to stick with her.  And since it was just the two of them for a while (plus the dog), Dorothy and the Scarecrow had their own shenanigans, without anyone else there to take from the friendship pie.  This gave them the opportunity to develop a relationship of more intimacy than the ones she developed with the Tin Man and Cowardly Lion, for the latter two had others there to share the pie with when they first arrived.  </p>
<p>So yeah, maybe she was being a little insensitive toward the other two, but she WAS only a teenager; and really, all she was doing was being honest in the face of saying goodbye to someone so important to her.  Call it the brutal honesty of the innocent, somewhat like when a three-year-old asks what the huge red spot (i.e. pimple) on your nose is very loudly.  She was just speaking from her heart and stating the conclusions she had come to.   </p>
<p>And here comes the book v. movie question.  I have never read the book, but I am curious as to whether she says she&#8217;d miss the Scarecrow &#8220;most of all&#8221; or something along those lines in that case.  I&#8217;m going to adjudge a guess of no, but if you or anyone else has read it and can clear it up, that would be awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/10/26/not-cool-dorothy/#comment-2394</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=2279#comment-2394</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a lot about The Wizard of Oz that doesn&#039;t sit well with me.  

But anyway, I found out about your site today in a link from IMDB.  Very interesting and funny, but I&#039;m sure you get that all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot about The Wizard of Oz that doesn&#8217;t sit well with me.  </p>
<p>But anyway, I found out about your site today in a link from IMDB.  Very interesting and funny, but I&#8217;m sure you get that all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virgil Ikari</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/10/26/not-cool-dorothy/#comment-2393</link>
		<dc:creator>Virgil Ikari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=2279#comment-2393</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t this a scene on Family Guy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t this a scene on Family Guy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 489/493 objects using memcached

Served from: www.overthinkingit.com @ 2012-02-13 23:03:01 -->
