<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Research, New York Times, Research!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/10/23/research-new-york-times-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/10/23/research-new-york-times-research/</link>
	<description>Overthinking It subjects the popular culture to a level of scrutiny it probably doesn&#039;t deserve.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:16:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Johann</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/10/23/research-new-york-times-research/#comment-4639</link>
		<dc:creator>Johann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=2384#comment-4639</guid>
		<description>Interestingly, in German the Mechanical Turk has left his imprint in the language: The verb &lt;i&gt;türken&lt;/i&gt; (to turk sth.) is used to indicate that something is rigged in order to decieve somebody. You could say for instance that a company&#039;s balance sheet or a researcher&#039;s statistics results are &lt;i&gt;getürkt&lt;/i&gt; (&quot;turked&quot;). Using the word is not politically correct, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, in German the Mechanical Turk has left his imprint in the language: The verb <i>türken</i> (to turk sth.) is used to indicate that something is rigged in order to decieve somebody. You could say for instance that a company&#8217;s balance sheet or a researcher&#8217;s statistics results are <i>getürkt</i> (&#8220;turked&#8221;). Using the word is not politically correct, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/10/23/research-new-york-times-research/#comment-3380</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=2384#comment-3380</guid>
		<description>&quot;Fuentes on Fri, 24th Oct 2008 12:25 pm  

Or maybe, “The Turk” is just a hint about how “Terminator Salvation” ends …

***PROBABLY SPOILER***

At the end, inside the big machine that controlls every bad robot, is a very bad human. (Get it? Turk, Chess computer, with no Intel-inside; but Dude-inside?)&quot;

OMG--skynet is gantz!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Fuentes on Fri, 24th Oct 2008 12:25 pm  </p>
<p>Or maybe, “The Turk” is just a hint about how “Terminator Salvation” ends …</p>
<p>***PROBABLY SPOILER***</p>
<p>At the end, inside the big machine that controlls every bad robot, is a very bad human. (Get it? Turk, Chess computer, with no Intel-inside; but Dude-inside?)&#8221;</p>
<p>OMG&#8211;skynet is gantz!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gab</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/10/23/research-new-york-times-research/#comment-2361</link>
		<dc:creator>Gab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=2384#comment-2361</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking Men in Black.  &quot;The little dude inside the big dude&#039;s head.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking Men in Black.  &#8220;The little dude inside the big dude&#8217;s head.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/10/23/research-new-york-times-research/#comment-2347</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=2384#comment-2347</guid>
		<description>Fuentes, you have a strong theory. What we &quot;know&quot; is that Skynet caused a nuclear holocaust wiping out most of the human population. But what if some HUMAN actually planned that, and just used Skynet as a scapegoat? Then again, it&#039;s hard to imagine what kind of person would want the outcome depicted in the Terminator movies. So maybe the real person behind Skynet is planning something else, but he&#039;s about to lose control of his baby. (For this exact scenario, see Tron.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuentes, you have a strong theory. What we &#8220;know&#8221; is that Skynet caused a nuclear holocaust wiping out most of the human population. But what if some HUMAN actually planned that, and just used Skynet as a scapegoat? Then again, it&#8217;s hard to imagine what kind of person would want the outcome depicted in the Terminator movies. So maybe the real person behind Skynet is planning something else, but he&#8217;s about to lose control of his baby. (For this exact scenario, see Tron.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fuentes</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/10/23/research-new-york-times-research/#comment-2345</link>
		<dc:creator>Fuentes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=2384#comment-2345</guid>
		<description>Or maybe, &quot;The Turk&quot; is just a hint about how &quot;Terminator Salvation&quot; ends ...

***PROBABLY SPOILER***

At the end, inside the big machine that controlls every bad robot, is a very bad human. (Get it? Turk, Chess computer, with no Intel-inside; but Dude-inside?)

:O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or maybe, &#8220;The Turk&#8221; is just a hint about how &#8220;Terminator Salvation&#8221; ends &#8230;</p>
<p>***PROBABLY SPOILER***</p>
<p>At the end, inside the big machine that controlls every bad robot, is a very bad human. (Get it? Turk, Chess computer, with no Intel-inside; but Dude-inside?)</p>
<p>:O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gab</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/10/23/research-new-york-times-research/#comment-2332</link>
		<dc:creator>Gab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=2384#comment-2332</guid>
		<description>Gr, so click on the link the article about Orientalism in general gives to the book in the opening blurb.  I really should learn HTML to avoid this kind of crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gr, so click on the link the article about Orientalism in general gives to the book in the opening blurb.  I really should learn HTML to avoid this kind of crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gab</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/10/23/research-new-york-times-research/#comment-2331</link>
		<dc:creator>Gab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=2384#comment-2331</guid>
		<description>Exoticism?  18th Century?  Racism?  Sounds like the modern definition of Orientalism, to me.  In case you haven&#039;t read Said&#039;s groundbreaking book (one I had to read in THREE classes during college because of how theory-based my major was...), here&#039;s a link to the Wiki.  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orientalism_(book)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exoticism?  18th Century?  Racism?  Sounds like the modern definition of Orientalism, to me.  In case you haven&#8217;t read Said&#8217;s groundbreaking book (one I had to read in THREE classes during college because of how theory-based my major was&#8230;), here&#8217;s a link to the Wiki.  </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orientalism_(book)" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orientalism_(book)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fenzel</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/10/23/research-new-york-times-research/#comment-2320</link>
		<dc:creator>fenzel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=2384#comment-2320</guid>
		<description>If anything, wouldn&#039;t calling the ruling machine &quot;The Turk&quot; in a contemporary setting cast it as aggressively secular?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anything, wouldn&#8217;t calling the ruling machine &#8220;The Turk&#8221; in a contemporary setting cast it as aggressively secular?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stokes</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/10/23/research-new-york-times-research/#comment-2317</link>
		<dc:creator>Stokes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=2384#comment-2317</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re *certainly* right about the Times writer.  She seems to have been looking for Al Qaeda symbolism behind The Turk, and I don&#039;t think it&#039;s there to be found.  You might also be right about the Terminator writers.  They do like to play up the whole &quot;machines and people are kind of the same&quot; angle.  But when they decided to invoke the original Mechanical Turk, they also picked up some of its cultural baggage, whether they meant to or not.  The Turk isn&#039;t the most offensive thing in the world... but it&#039;s not *totally* innocent either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re *certainly* right about the Times writer.  She seems to have been looking for Al Qaeda symbolism behind The Turk, and I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s there to be found.  You might also be right about the Terminator writers.  They do like to play up the whole &#8220;machines and people are kind of the same&#8221; angle.  But when they decided to invoke the original Mechanical Turk, they also picked up some of its cultural baggage, whether they meant to or not.  The Turk isn&#8217;t the most offensive thing in the world&#8230; but it&#8217;s not *totally* innocent either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlawski</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/10/23/research-new-york-times-research/#comment-2316</link>
		<dc:creator>mlawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 04:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=2384#comment-2316</guid>
		<description>Stokes, your argument sounds perfectly valid to me.  But if the Times meant that, wouldn&#039;t they have said so?  And maybe this is a stupid question, but if the Terminator writers were thinking of that, wouldn&#039;t they have made at least one of the Terminators Middle Eastern?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stokes, your argument sounds perfectly valid to me.  But if the Times meant that, wouldn&#8217;t they have said so?  And maybe this is a stupid question, but if the Terminator writers were thinking of that, wouldn&#8217;t they have made at least one of the Terminators Middle Eastern?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 556/559 objects using memcached

Served from: www.overthinkingit.com @ 2012-02-14 02:23:50 -->
