<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Douchebags</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/09/04/on-douchebags/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/09/04/on-douchebags/</link>
	<description>Overthinking It subjects the popular culture to a level of scrutiny it probably doesn&#039;t deserve.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:41:55 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mlawski</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/09/04/on-douchebags/#comment-1491</link>
		<dc:creator>mlawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=1426#comment-1491</guid>
		<description>Wow, I&#039;ve never been complimented with the word cuntastic before.  It makes me feel all tingly inside.  Thanks, Jesswa!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I&#8217;ve never been complimented with the word cuntastic before.  It makes me feel all tingly inside.  Thanks, Jesswa!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesswa</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/09/04/on-douchebags/#comment-1490</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesswa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=1426#comment-1490</guid>
		<description>I also think douche isn&#039;t offensive to women because it&#039;s pretty widely agreed that it&#039;s a stupid, outdated, paranoia-spreading invention based around the stupid, outdated, paranoia-spreading belief that your cooch is nasty. Which is weird, considering that the Cooch has been housing penises and who-knows-what-else since the beginning of time, offering pleasure and the occasional baby, without complaint. It didn&#039;t take long for the fashion and beauty market to grab onto the genital market...

Guh. It&#039;s creepy. Like one of those air freshener adverts...&quot;No one likes to come home to a stinky vagina - especially if you&#039;re entertaining unexpected guests. Let the clean scent of Mountain Spring into your vaj. Douching doesn&#039;t just cover up bad odours, it eliminates them...&quot;

Goddammit, some things just aren&#039;t meant to smell like Island Splash!

- Jesswa

PS &quot;Cunt&quot; is an awesome word I&#039;m desperate to de-dirty. Cuntastic article, mlawski. ^^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think douche isn&#8217;t offensive to women because it&#8217;s pretty widely agreed that it&#8217;s a stupid, outdated, paranoia-spreading invention based around the stupid, outdated, paranoia-spreading belief that your cooch is nasty. Which is weird, considering that the Cooch has been housing penises and who-knows-what-else since the beginning of time, offering pleasure and the occasional baby, without complaint. It didn&#8217;t take long for the fashion and beauty market to grab onto the genital market&#8230;</p>
<p>Guh. It&#8217;s creepy. Like one of those air freshener adverts&#8230;&#8221;No one likes to come home to a stinky vagina &#8211; especially if you&#8217;re entertaining unexpected guests. Let the clean scent of Mountain Spring into your vaj. Douching doesn&#8217;t just cover up bad odours, it eliminates them&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Goddammit, some things just aren&#8217;t meant to smell like Island Splash!</p>
<p>- Jesswa</p>
<p>PS &#8220;Cunt&#8221; is an awesome word I&#8217;m desperate to de-dirty. Cuntastic article, mlawski. ^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Chan</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/09/04/on-douchebags/#comment-1446</link>
		<dc:creator>M Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 04:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=1426#comment-1446</guid>
		<description>in med school we learned that douches can increase your chances of getting a vaginal infection.  which is funny, because i&#039;d say most human douchebags also increase your chances of getting an std.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in med school we learned that douches can increase your chances of getting a vaginal infection.  which is funny, because i&#8217;d say most human douchebags also increase your chances of getting an std.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fenzel</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/09/04/on-douchebags/#comment-1439</link>
		<dc:creator>fenzel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=1426#comment-1439</guid>
		<description>Great article!

I accidentally posted this in a different comment thread, but I&#039;ll shorten it and add it here.

I think &quot;douchebag&quot; describes a guy who is not sexually desirable to women (or at least to a woman with standards), but who thinks and acts like he is.

Similarly to how a douche claims that women want to put it in their vaginas when they do not. There are few things that scream &quot;Get away from my vagina, yuck! Unsexy!&quot; like a douche or sex with Sean Hannity.

And the analogous word on the other gender is &quot;cumdumpster&quot; -- except it is much fouler and reflects the double standard -- women who have sex with lots of men are sluts, but men who don&#039;t have sex with lots of women are weak.

And I think the word &quot;douche&quot; is funny because it is a very rare sort of word -- a patriarchal word that is yonocentric rather than phallocentric.

Oh, other words that reinforce the partiarchal double-standards and other rules revolve around female genitalia, but &quot;douchebag&quot; is the rare insult that is on the vagina&#039;s side and lines up with its interests.

So, there&#039;s an irony to that and a surprise, and it makes people laugh.

I read the subtext as &quot;Now, like a good man, you&#039;re supposed to have sex with lots of women and be able to control them and treat them like objects. But goddammit, they don&#039;t like you, because you are a douche. So shut up until you can act in a way that makes a vagina happy and want to be around you.&quot;

A rare, sweet-smelling sentiment from the patriarchy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article!</p>
<p>I accidentally posted this in a different comment thread, but I&#8217;ll shorten it and add it here.</p>
<p>I think &#8220;douchebag&#8221; describes a guy who is not sexually desirable to women (or at least to a woman with standards), but who thinks and acts like he is.</p>
<p>Similarly to how a douche claims that women want to put it in their vaginas when they do not. There are few things that scream &#8220;Get away from my vagina, yuck! Unsexy!&#8221; like a douche or sex with Sean Hannity.</p>
<p>And the analogous word on the other gender is &#8220;cumdumpster&#8221; &#8212; except it is much fouler and reflects the double standard &#8212; women who have sex with lots of men are sluts, but men who don&#8217;t have sex with lots of women are weak.</p>
<p>And I think the word &#8220;douche&#8221; is funny because it is a very rare sort of word &#8212; a patriarchal word that is yonocentric rather than phallocentric.</p>
<p>Oh, other words that reinforce the partiarchal double-standards and other rules revolve around female genitalia, but &#8220;douchebag&#8221; is the rare insult that is on the vagina&#8217;s side and lines up with its interests.</p>
<p>So, there&#8217;s an irony to that and a surprise, and it makes people laugh.</p>
<p>I read the subtext as &#8220;Now, like a good man, you&#8217;re supposed to have sex with lots of women and be able to control them and treat them like objects. But goddammit, they don&#8217;t like you, because you are a douche. So shut up until you can act in a way that makes a vagina happy and want to be around you.&#8221;</p>
<p>A rare, sweet-smelling sentiment from the patriarchy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlawski</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/09/04/on-douchebags/#comment-1422</link>
		<dc:creator>mlawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=1426#comment-1422</guid>
		<description>Ha, great Onion article.  I actually got in big trouble in Hebrew school by using the word schmuck, but I didn&#039;t understand why.  I mean, the word was Jewish-y.  Shouldn&#039;t I have been praised for using it?

This is why I&#039;m an atheist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, great Onion article.  I actually got in big trouble in Hebrew school by using the word schmuck, but I didn&#8217;t understand why.  I mean, the word was Jewish-y.  Shouldn&#8217;t I have been praised for using it?</p>
<p>This is why I&#8217;m an atheist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/09/04/on-douchebags/#comment-1418</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=1426#comment-1418</guid>
		<description>On the subject of replacements for &quot;douchebag&quot;, i might suggest an old favorite that was mentioned in the onion a while back: http://www.theonion.com/content/news/mel_brooks_starts_nonprofit

And on the general subject of misogynistic language, I would be remiss without pointing everyone to this classic from the Public Service Administration: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Euu_DMhsXQo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the subject of replacements for &#8220;douchebag&#8221;, i might suggest an old favorite that was mentioned in the onion a while back: <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/news/mel_brooks_starts_nonprofit" rel="nofollow">http://www.theonion.com/content/news/mel_brooks_starts_nonprofit</a></p>
<p>And on the general subject of misogynistic language, I would be remiss without pointing everyone to this classic from the Public Service Administration:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Euu_DMhsXQo" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Euu_DMhsXQo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlawski</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/09/04/on-douchebags/#comment-1417</link>
		<dc:creator>mlawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 04:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=1426#comment-1417</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;m the only girl :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m the only girl :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gab</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/09/04/on-douchebags/#comment-1416</link>
		<dc:creator>Gab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 01:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=1426#comment-1416</guid>
		<description>Are you the only woman on this site, Mlwaski?  As has been noted, there is no contact list...  And there is no page telling us who each of you are.

I&#039;m rather fond of &quot;asshat&quot; myself and use it frequently.

While I do say &quot;bitch&quot; and &quot;douche,&quot; I&#039;m averse to the &quot;c&quot; word.  I feel like its origin is too derrogitory to be acceptable.  I do NOT think it&#039;s cool for African-Americans to use the &quot;n&quot; word for the same reason, so I&#039;d be a hypocrite if I used the &quot;c&quot; word.  I&#039;m Native American, and I don&#039;t like it when other Natives (and of course white people) say the &quot;RS&quot; word.  &quot;Indian&quot; isn&#039;t so bad- we call Reservations &quot;Indian Country&quot; and &quot;tribal law&quot; and &quot;Indian law&quot; are more or less synonymous; but &quot;RS&quot; was too mean in its origin for it to be acceptable, in my opinion.  

And I too didn&#039;t know what a douche really was until college, either...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you the only woman on this site, Mlwaski?  As has been noted, there is no contact list&#8230;  And there is no page telling us who each of you are.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m rather fond of &#8220;asshat&#8221; myself and use it frequently.</p>
<p>While I do say &#8220;bitch&#8221; and &#8220;douche,&#8221; I&#8217;m averse to the &#8220;c&#8221; word.  I feel like its origin is too derrogitory to be acceptable.  I do NOT think it&#8217;s cool for African-Americans to use the &#8220;n&#8221; word for the same reason, so I&#8217;d be a hypocrite if I used the &#8220;c&#8221; word.  I&#8217;m Native American, and I don&#8217;t like it when other Natives (and of course white people) say the &#8220;RS&#8221; word.  &#8220;Indian&#8221; isn&#8217;t so bad- we call Reservations &#8220;Indian Country&#8221; and &#8220;tribal law&#8221; and &#8220;Indian law&#8221; are more or less synonymous; but &#8220;RS&#8221; was too mean in its origin for it to be acceptable, in my opinion.  </p>
<p>And I too didn&#8217;t know what a douche really was until college, either&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cushman</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/09/04/on-douchebags/#comment-1415</link>
		<dc:creator>cushman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=1426#comment-1415</guid>
		<description>::waits patiently for the obvious follow-up post, &quot;on doucheclowns::</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>::waits patiently for the obvious follow-up post, &#8220;on doucheclowns::</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad McDouche</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/09/04/on-douchebags/#comment-1411</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad McDouche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=1426#comment-1411</guid>
		<description>I find all of this to be offensive to my brother douchebags. 

-Chad McDouche
President, International Broheemhood of Douchebags</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find all of this to be offensive to my brother douchebags. </p>
<p>-Chad McDouche<br />
President, International Broheemhood of Douchebags</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
