<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Beat With Retarded Policeman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/06/08/on-the-beat-with-retarded-policeman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/06/08/on-the-beat-with-retarded-policeman/</link>
	<description>Overthinking It subjects the popular culture to a level of scrutiny it probably doesn&#039;t deserve.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:16:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: fenzel</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/06/08/on-the-beat-with-retarded-policeman/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>fenzel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=341#comment-448</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Nathan. Yeah, the overthinking is contagious.

You definitely have a point, but the ethics of &quot;You and I are doing the same thing, but I&#039;m doing it for the right reasons, and without other information I&#039;m just going to guess that you&#039;re doing it for the wrong reasons, therefore I am a good person and you are not a good person.&quot; are as shaky as they are tempting.

One of the big problems of going down that road is that the relative difficulty people have with communicating their intentions varies very widely, not to mention the methods with which they are familiar/comforable. Somebody might be doing something for the right reasons and just not be communicating it to you in a way you understand. Comdemnnig them for that leans into a form of either elitism or xenophobia.

Part of training ourselves to read things closely is to be able to bridge the gap in facility and method of communication --  to get better at interpreting. Although intention proves to be a bit of a sticky wicket.

But when it comes to people who are just sort of &quot;out there&quot; and whom we don&#039;t even know, let alone talk with personally, making assumptions like this, even when it&#039;s correct, probably does more harm than good.

If there&#039;s a good reason to do something, and people are doing that thing, I would rather spread the word about the good reason than insist than those with bad intentions just stop. Although I confess I will do the latter from time to time.

And my primary concern in thinking about Retarded Policeman was that there may not be any good reason. 

Having looked at it in more depth, I think there are a bunch of good reasons, and I&#039;m very glad Mediocre Films made this series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Nathan. Yeah, the overthinking is contagious.</p>
<p>You definitely have a point, but the ethics of &#8220;You and I are doing the same thing, but I&#8217;m doing it for the right reasons, and without other information I&#8217;m just going to guess that you&#8217;re doing it for the wrong reasons, therefore I am a good person and you are not a good person.&#8221; are as shaky as they are tempting.</p>
<p>One of the big problems of going down that road is that the relative difficulty people have with communicating their intentions varies very widely, not to mention the methods with which they are familiar/comforable. Somebody might be doing something for the right reasons and just not be communicating it to you in a way you understand. Comdemnnig them for that leans into a form of either elitism or xenophobia.</p>
<p>Part of training ourselves to read things closely is to be able to bridge the gap in facility and method of communication &#8212;  to get better at interpreting. Although intention proves to be a bit of a sticky wicket.</p>
<p>But when it comes to people who are just sort of &#8220;out there&#8221; and whom we don&#8217;t even know, let alone talk with personally, making assumptions like this, even when it&#8217;s correct, probably does more harm than good.</p>
<p>If there&#8217;s a good reason to do something, and people are doing that thing, I would rather spread the word about the good reason than insist than those with bad intentions just stop. Although I confess I will do the latter from time to time.</p>
<p>And my primary concern in thinking about Retarded Policeman was that there may not be any good reason. </p>
<p>Having looked at it in more depth, I think there are a bunch of good reasons, and I&#8217;m very glad Mediocre Films made this series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wrather</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/06/08/on-the-beat-with-retarded-policeman/#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>wrather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=341#comment-447</guid>
		<description>Are you calling Ben Stiller retarded?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you calling Ben Stiller retarded?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.overthinkingit.com/2008/06/08/on-the-beat-with-retarded-policeman/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.overthinkingit.com/?p=341#comment-442</guid>
		<description>So this made me shudder just by reading the title.  I thought it was going to be something just awful, like that Jonny Knoxville movie, but there is something redeeming in here.  

Part of accepting this, and maybe the hard part for some of the viewers, is that I had a hard time admitting to myself that I could really believe that a Down Syndrome patient could be this self-aware and interactive.  Overcoming my own prejudice was the hard part. 

Once my own biases were acknowledged (at least to myself), I had to admit that this show is at least as funny as anything that Ben Stiller has ever done.  

Another objection, though, is that I don&#039;t think that we who analyze our reactions to this are the majority viewers.  It&#039;s more likely that I would never watch this because it makes me uncomfortable, and the people who did watch were the ones who are comfortable with the idea of calling people retarded.

I suppose that Richard Pryor had to face similar criticism when he started the widespread reclamation of the word nigger by the black community.  Josh, by referring to himself as retarded, has taken away the power of that word from anyone else.  

Wow.  It&#039;s contagious. 
Now I&#039;m overthinking it, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this made me shudder just by reading the title.  I thought it was going to be something just awful, like that Jonny Knoxville movie, but there is something redeeming in here.  </p>
<p>Part of accepting this, and maybe the hard part for some of the viewers, is that I had a hard time admitting to myself that I could really believe that a Down Syndrome patient could be this self-aware and interactive.  Overcoming my own prejudice was the hard part. </p>
<p>Once my own biases were acknowledged (at least to myself), I had to admit that this show is at least as funny as anything that Ben Stiller has ever done.  </p>
<p>Another objection, though, is that I don&#8217;t think that we who analyze our reactions to this are the majority viewers.  It&#8217;s more likely that I would never watch this because it makes me uncomfortable, and the people who did watch were the ones who are comfortable with the idea of calling people retarded.</p>
<p>I suppose that Richard Pryor had to face similar criticism when he started the widespread reclamation of the word nigger by the black community.  Josh, by referring to himself as retarded, has taken away the power of that word from anyone else.  </p>
<p>Wow.  It&#8217;s contagious.<br />
Now I&#8217;m overthinking it, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 479/482 objects using memcached

Served from: www.overthinkingit.com @ 2012-02-14 02:48:48 -->
